Eshaghi v. Kunz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a two-month gap prior to the first alleged adverse employment action and a five-month gap prior to the other alleged adverse employment actions were insufficient to infer causality
• “The first element is not in dispute—Johnson engaged in protected activity by requesting an accommodation for her religious beliefs in May 2013.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).