Esekia v. Castagnetti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Nos. 18-4038/19-3218 Kada v. Barr Page 10 BIA violates fundamental legal principles and its own policies when it treats similarly-situated individuals differently without satisfactory explanation
• noting that “the ability of the [applicant’s] family to continue to live in Tanzania without adverse action by the government greatly diminishes the likelihood that [s]he will face harm if [s]he should return”
• “[T]he BIA’s denial of [petitioners’] asylum applications in the face of its grant of Lusingo’s application violated the fundamental legal principle—and the BIA’s own policy—that similarly- situated individuals should be treated similarly.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).