ESCOTO-CASTILLO v. Napolitano

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying a petition for review raising a legal question, in part, because alleged proof of the claimed legal error rested on a post-removal state court order that was not part of the administrative record on appeal
• \We have repeatedly held that failure to exhaust administrative immigration remedies precludes merits review of the unexhausted issue.\
• “We have repeatedly held that failure to exhaust administrative immigration remedies precludes merits review of the unexhausted issue.”
• checked box indicating admitted charges and removable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).