Escobar v. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court's refusal to return to Chile a nine-years old child, who was extremely communicative, was under no undue influence, and demonstrated sufficient age and maturity to take into account his objection
• appointing a psychologist to examine child

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).