Skip to main content
· 3/30/1959

Eschmann v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Citations

  • 110 So. 2d 135
  • 1959 La. App. LEXIS 812

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • allowing review of the merits when the appellant's brief did not comply with Rule 2111, but the court was able to deduce appellant's one issue on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McBride

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.