Skip to main content
· 12/13/2001

Escandon v. State

Citations

  • 347 Ark. 296
  • 61 S.W.3d 843
  • 2001 Ark. LEXIS 691

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • addressing whether an insurance company could be directly sued in a case involving the Motor Carrier Act
  • “[C]ourts may look to other provisions of the same statute to determine the meaning of a particular statutory provision. Context is a primary determinant of meaning.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ier, Imber

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.