· 4/18/1996
Escamilla v. Estate of Escamilla Ex Rel. Escamilla
Citations
- 921 S.W.2d 723
- 1996 WL 63966
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that testimony from prior proceeding noticed by trial court but not admitted into evidence constituted “no evidence”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seerden, Dorsey, Hinojosa
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.