Skip to main content
· 6/29/2006

Escamilla v. Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Citations

  • 46 Cal. Rptr. 3d 408
  • 141 Cal. App. 4th 498
  • 2006 Daily Journal DAR 9455
  • 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6525
  • 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1092

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • prisoner whose personal effects had been 9 | discarded by prison staff was not required to present claim, even though he would be recovering 10 | value of possessions, not possessions themselves

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McDONALD

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.