Skip to main content
· 6/24/2002

Esberg v. Union Oil Company

Citations

  • 47 P.3d 1069
  • 121 Cal. Rptr. 2d 203
  • 28 Cal. 4th 262
  • 18 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1409
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5609
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 7073
  • 2002 Cal. LEXIS 3801
  • 82 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,088
  • 89 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that employers must have adequate notice 26 of the conduct that will subject them to tort liability for wrongful discharge
  • failure to establish a violation of FEHA is fatal claim to a claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy based on FEHA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kennard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.