Erwin v. Bank of Kentucky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]here are no detailed factual allegations to support . . . [that] BNPP processed U.S. dollar transactions for Al Shamal before the embassy bombings.”
• “[T]he complaint does not contain any detailed factual allegations that BNPP knew about [Al- Shamal’s] supposed connections to al Qaeda . . . . [I]t appears that the relationship between Al Shamal and [b]in Laden was not widely reported until after the 1998 embassy bombings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).