Ervine v. Desert View Regional Medical Center Holdings, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ADA complaint was jurisdictionally defective because plaintiff did not 19 express any intent to return to allegedly noncompliant medical facility
• noting that the statute of limitations for Rehabilitation Act claims is “provided by analogous state law”
• noting that the statute of limitations for [RA] claims is “provided by analogous state law”
• noting that the statute of limitations 2 for Rehabilitation Act claims is “provided by analogous state law”
• finding that an ADA plaintiff who encountered a barrier at a hospital but alleged no 15 reason or intent to return to the hospital in the future lacked standing for injunctive relief
• finding that ADA plaintiff who 4 encountered a barrier at a hospital but alleged no reason or intent to return to the hospital in the 5 future lacked standing for injunctive relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).