Ervin v. CONTINENTAL CONVEYOR & EQUIPMENT CO.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he courts of South Carolina have not had nor taken the opportunity to address industrial equipment within the context of the statute of repose.”
• “Although a close question of law, this Court does not conclude that the South Carolina courts would apply the statute of repose to the piece of moveable industrial equipment at issue in this case.”
• noting the “lack of specific precedential authority” on point

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).