Skip to main content
· 6/19/1957

Ervin v. Capital Weekly Post

Citations

  • 97 So. 2d 464

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • this Court retained jurisdiction to consider issue of public importance where appellees sought dismissal prior to initial decision
  • a statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed by the courts
  • a statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed by the courts
  • statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Parks

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.