· 6/19/1957
Ervin v. Capital Weekly Post
Citations
- 97 So. 2d 464
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- this Court retained jurisdiction to consider issue of public importance where appellees sought dismissal prior to initial decision
- a statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed by the courts
- a statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed by the courts
- statutory definition of a word is controlling and will be followed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parks
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.