Erodina Urbano De Malaluan v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the contention that a parent’s “deportation order would amount to a de facto deportation of the child and thus violate the constitutional rights of the child”
• rejecting the contention that a parent’s “deportation order would amount to a de facto deportation of the child and thus violate the constitutional rights of the child”
• rejecting the contention that a parent’s “deportation order would amount to a de facto deportation of the child and thus violate the constitutional rights of the child”
• alien who remained six years after being found deportable impliedly not precluded from seeking suspension of deportation
• alien who remained six years after being found deportable impliedly not precluded from seeking suspension of deportation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).