Skip to main content
· 2/28/1995

Ernzen v. Ernzen

Citations

  • 878 F. Supp. 190
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2565
  • 1995 WL 89212

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • denying pro se plaintiff’s request to videotape deposition “for failure to provide proper notice to the 13 30(d)(2). See Fed.R.Civ.P. 30(d
  • denying “for failure to arrange to have the videotaping conducted by an appropriate person, as required by Rules 30(b)(4) and 28(c)”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Earl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.