Skip to main content
· 1/25/1995

Ernst & Young v. Depositors Economic Protection Corp.

Citations

  • 45 F.3d 530
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 1387
  • 1995 WL 20852

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a court’s “discretion to grant declaratory relief is to be exercised with great circumspection when matters of public moment are involved”
  • stating that the Declaratory Judgment Act \is designed to enable litigants to clarify legal rights and obligations before acting upon them\
  • explaining that courts “must determine when declaratory judgments are appropriate and when they are not”
  • acknowledging that the two ripeness branches must operate on a sliding scale
  • stating that a ripe controversy exists then the issue is final, definite, dependent on sufficiently developed facts, and the challenged action creates a ‘direct and immediate’ dilemma for the parties.”
  • explaining that “the usefulness that may satisfy the hardship prong ... is not met by a party showing that it has the opportunity to move from a position of utter confusion to one of mere befuddlement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Selya, Bownes, Cyr

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.