· 11/10/1933
Ernst v. Deister
Citations
- 26 P.2d 648
- 42 Ariz. 379
- 1933 Ariz. LEXIS 149
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding jury could properly find that employee’s departure from ordinary route to eat dinner and obtain his coat was “reasonably incident to the employer’s business” because it ensured the employee’s comfort while performing his duties
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ross
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.