Skip to main content
· 11/10/1933

Ernst v. Deister

Citations

  • 26 P.2d 648
  • 42 Ariz. 379
  • 1933 Ariz. LEXIS 149

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding jury could properly find that employee’s departure from ordinary route to eat dinner and obtain his coat was “reasonably incident to the employer’s business” because it ensured the employee’s comfort while performing his duties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.