Skip to main content
· 4/16/1958

Ernst v. Broughton

Citations

  • 324 P.2d 241
  • 213 Or. 253
  • 1958 Ore. LEXIS 305

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Such view is never permitted for the purpose of using it as substantive evidence, but only in order to enable the jury to understand the testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Perry, Warner, Mc-Allister, Sloan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.