· 4/16/1958
Ernst v. Broughton
Citations
- 324 P.2d 241
- 213 Or. 253
- 1958 Ore. LEXIS 305
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Such view is never permitted for the purpose of using it as substantive evidence, but only in order to enable the jury to understand the testimony”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Perry, Warner, Mc-Allister, Sloan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.