Ernest Wilson v. Arthur J. Delaunay

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no material difference between the singular and plural forms of ZOMBIE such that the marks were considered the same mark
• ZOMBIE for candy is likely to cause confusion with ZOMBIES for a candy-like confection in the nature of a macaroon
• there is no material difference, in a trademark sense, between the singular and plural forms of a word
• “It is evident that there is no material difference, in a trademark sense, between the singular and plural forms of the word ‘Zombie’ and they will therefore be regarded here as the same mark”
• “It is evident that there is no material difference, in a trademark sense, between the singular and plural forms of the word ‘Zombie’ and they will therefore be regarded here as the same mark.”
• “It is evident that there is no 7 Ser No. 77903451 material difference, in a trademark sense, between the singular and plural forms of the word ‘Zombie’ and they will therefore be regarded here as the same mark.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).