Ernest Stich and Miriam Stich v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that plaintiff who claimed surprise by physician’s use of recently completed report presented “a problem which plaintiffs did nothing to mitigate”
• finding that “[i]n the absence of any timely, specific objection, we cannot predicate any error on the admission” of certain evidence
• “The substantial discretion granted to trial courts on discovery motions should not be lightly disturbed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).