Ernest M. Bolling v. Eli Lilly and Company Employee Benefits Committee, Ernest M. Bolling v. Eli Lilly and Company Employee Benefits Committee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding district court conducted de novo review when it construed evidence in light most favorable to the appellant, faulted the Committee for its conduct, and held that conclusions formed by appellant’s doctors years after relevant injury were binding on Committee
• finding district court conducted de novo review when it construed evidence in light most favorable to the appellant, faulted the Committee for its conduct, and held that conclusions formed by appellant’s doctors years after relevant injury were binding on Committee
• decision not unreasonable simply because it adopts one of two competing medical opinions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).