Skip to main content
· 1/31/1963

Ernest Joseph Mills v. Harry C. Tinsley, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary

Citations

  • 314 F.2d 311
  • 1963 U.S. App. LEXIS 6267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • considering length of case as a factor that justified extended deliberations
  • considering length of case as a factor that justified extended deliberations
  • trial court’s response to deadlock note stating that it had no response and allowing jury to deliberate for two more hours before giving instruction did not amount to coercion
  • trial court's response to deadlock note stating that it had no response and allowing jury to deliberate for two more hours before giving instruction did not amount to coercion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Breitenstein, Hill, Seth

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.