Skip to main content
· 11/12/1969

Ernest J. Hendry v. United States

Citations

  • 418 F.2d 774
  • 9 A.L.R. Fed. 1
  • 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10071

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is clear that § 2680(a) was intended to protect the validity of governmental regulations from challenge in a tort action for damages____”
  • discretionary function exception applies where governing statute or regulation comtemplates that an official will make new rules or ad hoc decisions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Waterman, Friendly, Kaufman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.