· 11/12/1969
Ernest J. Hendry v. United States
Citations
- 418 F.2d 774
- 9 A.L.R. Fed. 1
- 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 10071
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “It is clear that § 2680(a) was intended to protect the validity of governmental regulations from challenge in a tort action for damages____”
- discretionary function exception applies where governing statute or regulation comtemplates that an official will make new rules or ad hoc decisions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Waterman, Friendly, Kaufman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.