Skip to main content
· 2/8/1966

Ernest Hammond v. United States

Citations

  • 356 F.2d 931
  • 1966 U.S. App. LEXIS 7241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • any number of “almost errors”, if not “errors” cannot constitute error; on direct review refusal to stack

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Circuit'Judge, Chambers, Barnes, Jertberg

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.