Skip to main content
· 11/30/1990

Ernest Edwards and Sarah Edwards v. Cass County, Texas, Paul Boone and Gary Pixley

Citations

  • 919 F.2d 273
  • 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20802
  • 1990 WL 186090

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that a district court’s refusal to allow the filing of an untimely motion, especially where no extension had been sought, was well within the court’s discretion
  • The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
  • “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
  • “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
  • “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
  • “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gee, Smith, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.