· 11/30/1990
Ernest Edwards and Sarah Edwards v. Cass County, Texas, Paul Boone and Gary Pixley
Citations
- 919 F.2d 273
- 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 20802
- 1990 WL 186090
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that a district court’s refusal to allow the filing of an untimely motion, especially where no extension had been sought, was well within the court’s discretion
- The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
- “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
- “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
- “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
- “The district court has broad discretion in controlling its own docket. This includes the ambit of scheduling orders and the like.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gee, Smith, Wiener
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.