Ernest Daniels v. Jerry Southfort

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that the defendant officers “searched and arrested the plaintiff without probable cause” were “too vague to be cognizable at law”
• holding that plaintiff’s allegation that defendants “searched and arrested the plaintiff without probable cause and without any justification, for the purpose [of] harassing the plaintiff and inflicting summary punishment upon the plaintiff” were too vague to state a claim
• stating that plaintiff could file complaint against officers for unreasonably entering his apartment, tearing down his bathroom ceiling, and breaking his telephones and cable box in violation of Fourth Amendment
• stating that plaintiff could file complaint against officers for unreasonably entering his apartment, tearing down his bathroom ceiling, and breaking his telephones and cable box in violation of Fourth Amendment
• describing prerequisites for such relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).