Skip to main content
· 10/2/1992

Ernest Dague, Sr., Ernest Dague, Jr., Betty Dague, and Rose A. Bessette v. City of Burlington

Citations

  • 976 F.2d 801
  • 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 21497
  • 35 ERC (BNA) 1971
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 31180

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “determination of a reasonable attorney’s fee ... should normally be decided by the district court in the first instance”
  • holding that \determination of a reasonable attorney's fee ... should normally be decided by the district court in the first instance\
  • holding that \determination of a reasonable attorney's fee ... should normally be decided by the district court in the first instance\
  • pointing out that attorneys’ fee applications should usually be addressed in first instance by district court
  • plaintiff seeking fees in connection with appeal should first file in appellate court, at which point appellate court can determine whether fees issues “should be referred to the district court for decision”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newman, Pratt, Griesa, Southern, York

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.