Ernest Conrod, Jr. v. Roger Davis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the doctrine does not deprive the district court of the ability to reconsider earlier rulings and if the district court believes that an earlier decision was reached in error, it may revisit the decision to avoid later reversal
• noting the law of the case doctrine does not prevent district courts from reconsidering a prior ruling if they believe it was made in error and that reconsideration may avoid later reversal
• “Where the district court believes that an earlier decision was reached in error, it may revisit the decision to avoid later, reversal.”
• “[wjhere the district court believes that an earlier decision was reached in error, it may revisit the decision ‘to avoid later reversal’ ”
• “The doctrine of the ‘law of the case’ is a discretionary tool permitting a district court to effectively manage the legal issues arising during litigation. It does not deprive the district court of the ability to reconsider earlier rulings.” (internal citation omitted)
• “The doctrine of the ‘law of the case’ is a discretionary tool permitting a district court to effectively manage the legal issues arising during litigation. It does not deprive the district court of the ability to reconsider earlier rulings.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).