Erna Aletta Cox v. Kevin Stuart Cox

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no abuse of discretion when the NLRB relied on “other civil and criminal remedies” to punish victim of an unfair labor practice for lying to the Board rather than denying him administrative relief
• \False testimony in a formal proceeding is intolerable. We must neither reward nor condone such a `flagrant affront' to the truth-seeking function of adversary proceedings.\
• “False testimony in a formal proceeding is intolerable.... In any proceeding, whether judicial or administrative, deliberate falsehoods 'well may affect the dearest concerns of the parties before a tribunal!
• agency interpretation of a statute it does not administer is entitled to no deference
• “the gravest consequence of lying under oath is the affront to the law itself”
• “When Congress expressly delegates to an administrative agency the authority to make specific policy determinations, courts must give the agency’s decision controlling weight unless it is ‘arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute.’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).