Ermler v. Town of Brookhaven

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing right of public access to criminal discovery materials in context of protective order
• Indeed, good cause remains the standard even where parties consent to a stipulated protective order.”
• “these rules are meant to foster the use of compulsory process to facilitate orderly preparation for trial, not to educate or titillate the public”
• “these rules are meant to foster the use of compulsory process to facilitate orderly preparation for trial, not to educate or titillate the public”
• “Because discovery is a private process between the parties to an action (even if governed by specific rules and managed by trial judges
• “None of this means that Defendants will not be able to challenge the designation of certain documents, or otherwise request a modification of the Protective Order should circumstances change.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).