· 11/15/1982
Erman v. United States
Citations
- 459 U.S. 1021
- 103 S. Ct. 387
- 51 U.S.L.W. 3379
- 74 L. Ed. 2d 517
- 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declining as unnecessary to consider other alleged breach of a contract in an order denying summary judgment because a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to one alleged breach was sufficient to deny the motion
- declining as unnecessary to consider other alleged breach of a contract in an order denying summary judgment because a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to one alleged breach was sufficient to deny the motion
- “[I]t is inappropriate to raise new claims for the first time in submissions in opposition to summary judgment.”
- “[I]t is basic, black-letter law that the existence of even one disputed issue of material fact renders a grant of summary judgment inappropriate ... .”
- “[I]t is inappropriate to raise new claims for the first time in submissions in opposition to summary judgment.”
- “[I]t is basic, black-letter law that the existence of even one disputed issue of material fact renders a grant of summary judgment inappropriate ... .”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.