Skip to main content
· 11/15/1982

Erman v. United States

Citations

  • 459 U.S. 1021
  • 103 S. Ct. 387
  • 51 U.S.L.W. 3379
  • 74 L. Ed. 2d 517
  • 1982 U.S. LEXIS 4419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining as unnecessary to consider other alleged breach of a contract in an order denying summary judgment because a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to one alleged breach was sufficient to deny the motion
  • declining as unnecessary to consider other alleged breach of a contract in an order denying summary judgment because a genuine dispute of material fact with respect to one alleged breach was sufficient to deny the motion
  • “[I]t is inappropriate to raise new claims for the first time in submissions in opposition to summary judgment.”
  • “[I]t is basic, black-letter law that the existence of even one disputed issue of material fact renders a grant of summary judgment inappropriate ... .”
  • “[I]t is inappropriate to raise new claims for the first time in submissions in opposition to summary judgment.”
  • “[I]t is basic, black-letter law that the existence of even one disputed issue of material fact renders a grant of summary judgment inappropriate ... .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.