Skip to main content
· 4/1/1992

Erma Stites v. United States

Citations

  • 960 F.2d 864
  • 978 F.3d 1091
  • 92 Daily Journal DAR 4368
  • 92 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 2773
  • 69 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1147
  • 1992 U.S. App. LEXIS 5559
  • 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 50,324
  • 1992 WL 61587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To prevail on [his] equal-protection claim, [Petitioner] ‘must [first] show that a 18 class that is similarly situated has been treated disparately.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Canby, Kozinski, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.