· 2/28/2011
Erlich v. OUELLETTE, LABONTE, ROBERGE AND ALLEN
Citations
- 637 F.3d 32
- 50 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 2231
- 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 3814
- 2011 WL 679433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- \Applying a discovery rule in these circumstances would represent a significant step in expanding Maine law that we decline to take.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lynch, Boudin, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.