Erle E. Peacock, Jr. v. Merlin K. Duval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because at least some of Peacock’s words and writings concern questions of policy relating to the administration of a public medical school, his speech clearly transcends mere academic bickering.”
• “[S]ummary judgment is inappropriate when 10 ‘questions of motive predominate in the inquiry about how big a role the protected behavior played in’ the employment decision.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).