Skip to main content
· 5/6/2004

Erivas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.

Citations

  • 141 S.W.3d 671
  • 2004 Tex. App. LEXIS 4428
  • 2004 WL 1045146

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting attorney's fees where employee's attorney obtained UIM benefits, then fought against subrogation lien
  • granting attorney’s fees where employee’s attorney obtained UIM benefits, then fought against subrogation lien
  • granting attorney's fees where employee's attorney obtained UIM benefits, then fought against subrogation lien
  • “An attorney ‘actively represents’ a carrier when he or she ‘takes steps, adequate when measured by the difficulty of the case, toward prosecuting the claim.’”
  • “We find that the plain meaning of Section 417.001 creates a right of subrogation against a third party who is or becomes liable to pay damages, including an employer's UIM insurance carrier found liable to pay damages.”
  • “We find that the plain meaning of Section 417.001 creates a right of subrogation against a third party who is or becomes liable to pay damages, including an employer’s UIM insurance carrier found liable to pay damages.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larsen, McClure, Chew

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.