Erik Nunez v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[b]ecause the defen- dant did not establish that [the third party] was an agent or employee of [the plaintiff’s predecessor in interest], the court correctly concluded that the defendant could not prevail on his special defense of unconscionabil- ity’’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).