· 10/27/1993
Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. Smith
Citations
- 622 N.E.2d 515
- 1993 Ind. LEXIS 175
- 1993 WL 433433
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “[t]he lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for a breach of the duty of good faith in the insurance context
- recognizing that “[t]he lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for a breach of the duty of good faith in the insurance context
- recognizing that these two theories, though distinct, often overlap in “elements, defenses and recoveries”
- recognizing cause of action for tortious breach of insurer's duty to deal with insured in good faith
- observing that “the lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for bad faith
- noting that one of the primary factors the court considered was the “return to the rule of no punitive damages in contract cases ... ”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Krahulik, Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.