Skip to main content
· 10/27/1993

Erie Insurance v. Hickman Ex Rel. Smith

Citations

  • 622 N.E.2d 515
  • 1993 Ind. LEXIS 175
  • 1993 WL 433433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that “[t]he lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for a breach of the duty of good faith in the insurance context
  • recognizing that “[t]he lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for a breach of the duty of good faith in the insurance context
  • recognizing that these two theories, though distinct, often overlap in “elements, defenses and recoveries”
  • recognizing cause of action for tortious breach of insurer's duty to deal with insured in good faith
  • observing that “the lack of diligent investigation alone is not sufficient to support an award” for bad faith
  • noting that one of the primary factors the court considered was the “return to the rule of no punitive damages in contract cases ... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Krahulik, Shepard, Debruler, Givan, Dickson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.