Erie Insurance Group v. Sear Corporation, Larry Bass, and Birch Dalton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that the court must give the “unambiguous” term “advertising” its plain, ordinary because it was not defined in the insurance policy
• stating that “actions taken in the course of advertising must involve actual, affirmative self-promotion of the actor’s goods or services.”
• rejecting the argument that an insurance policy term was ambiguous “on the basis of conflicting case law” interpreting the term
• rejecting the argument that an insurance policy term was ambiguous “on the basis of conflicting case law” interpreting the term
• rejecting the argument that an insurance policy term was ambiguous “on the basis of conflicting case law” interpreting the term
• rejecting the argument that an insurance policy term was ambiguous “on the basis of conflicting case law” interpreting the term

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).