Erie Insurance Exchange v. Gary H. Maxwell

Syllabus

Erie Insurance Exchange (\Erie\) commenced this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that Erie has no duty to defend its insureds in a separate action because the policies of insurance issued to its insureds provided no coverage for the claims asserted in that action. The insureds are the defendants in a separate action in which the buyers of the insureds' home allege that the insureds made negligent misrepresentations concerning the property's propensity to flood. The buyers sought to recover damages they sustained from flooding that occurred after the sale. Following discovery, Erie filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that the \negligence\ and \negligent misrepresentation\ claims asserted against its insureds do not contain any allegations that constitute an \occurrence\ as that term is defined in the policies therefore, there is no coverage and no duty to defend the insureds. The trial court denied the motion, and this appeal followed. We have determined that the \negligence\ and \negligent misrepresentation\ claims asserted against Erie's insureds do not arise from an \occurrence\ as that term is defined in the insurance policies therefore, there is no coverage, and Erie has no duty to defend the insureds in the other action. For these reasons, we reverse the judgment of the trial court and remand with instructions to enter summary judgment in favor of Erie.