· 8/14/2023
Erie Insurance Exchange v. Backmeier, E.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- declaring that “governmental action” was required in a suit based on the Civil Rights Act of 1866
- following “the Supreme Court’s lead” in recognizing “some circumstances in which a court may refuse to enforce an arbitration award that is contrary to public policy”
- judicial enforcement of restrictive covenants prohibited by § 1982; the statute is directed toward gov ernmental action
- \State or Territory\ includes the District of Columbia for purposes of § 1982 because the statute is based upon the thirteenth amendment and thus is not limited to state action
- “State or Territory” includes the District of Columbia for purposes of § 1982 because the statute is based upon the thirteenth amendment and thus is not limited to state action
- federal courts have a duty to determine whether a contract violates federal law before enforcing them
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.