Ericsson v. Hubbard
Citations
- 129 Wash. 351
- 225 P. 234
- 1924 Wash. LEXIS 763
Syllabus
<p>Compromise and Settlement (3, 4) — Construction of Agreement —Items Included. Where the parties to a contract for railroad ties compromised their differences by a subsequent agreement, and the evidence and findings were to the effect that the entire controversy was thereby settled, conclusions of law allowing a recovery for some of the items forming part of the controversy which must have been included in the settlement are erroneous.</p> <p>Appeal (145) — Preservation of Grounds — Exceptions to Findings. Where findings are not excepted to and no request is made for proper findings, appellant is concluded thereby, and there can be no review of the evidence on appeal.</p>
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.