Erickson v. One Thirty-Three, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a mandatory dismissal, with prejudice, should have been granted, so as, to bar a second lawsuit and stating that a dismissal under NRCP 41(e) is res judicata and bars any other suit based on the same claim, unless otherwise provided by the court
• reaffirming mandatory nature of dismissal under Rule 41(e)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).