Erickson v. Hochbrune

Citations

• 47 Wash. 33
• 91 P. 485
• 1907 Wash. LEXIS 702

Syllabus

<p>Appeal—Review—Findings. Findings upon conflicting evidence by a trial judge who saw and heard the witnesses will not be disturbed on appeal.</p> <p>Estoppel—By Acquiescence—Evidence—Sufficiency—Work and Labor—Implied Contract. The evidence is not sufficient to show an estoppel, to deny an implied contract to pay for grading a lot, where the lot owner refused to enter into a written contract therefor with the party doing the grading, who was a contractor needing the dirt removed, and it appears that the owner notified him on several occasions to cease trespassing on the lot.</p>