Erickson v. General United Life Insurance Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that plaintiff’s averment that he “continuously objected to the statements and accountings of defendant” was “general in nature” and “insufficient to oppose a motion for summary judgment”
• “In order to successfully oppose a motion for summary judgment, a party cannot rely upon mere general statements of fact....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).