Skip to main content
· 6/12/2001

Erickson v. Bartell Drug Co.

Citations

  • 141 F. Supp. 2d 1266
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7550
  • 85 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1569
  • 2001 WL 649651

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Congress had “no specific intent regarding coverage for prescription contraceptives” in 1978
  • “disparate treatment 28 based on unique, sex-based characteristics . . . is sex discrimination prohibited by Title 1 VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lasnik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.