Ericksen v. Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• acknowledging that defendant’s judgment was incorrect because contempt is not a crime and cannot be the subject of a conviction
• reversing and remanding judgment that reflected conviction rather than finding of contempt
• per curiam opinion reversing a judgment that erroneously stated that a defendant had been “convicted of the crime of contempt”
• treating body of judgment as controlling over conflicting caption
• treating body of judgment as controlling over conflicting caption

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).