Skip to main content
· 10/10/1996

Erica Benson SPLUNGE, Sandra Calhoun, Tisha Scott, Jo Catherine Smoot, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. SHONEY’S, INC., Defendant-Appellant

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 488
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26474
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,361
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 259
  • 1996 WL 544027

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a supervisor of multiple restaurants in a restaurant chain was not high enough on the corporate hierarchy to show the defendant corporation “acted with the state of mind required for the imposition of punitive damages”
  • “[C]onsidering the plain language of the statute and the limited case law, we conclude that, at least ordinarily, constructive knowledge alone is insufficient to authorize the award of punitive damages under section 1981a.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edmondson, Dubina, Farris

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.