Eric Wheeler v. Dayton Police Department

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing the second case because when the plaintiff brought the first case, he could have “taken the next step and alleged (based on these same facts)” the second case’s claims
• “We reached the merits of the excessive-force challenge, because dismissals on statute-of-limitations grounds are judgments on the merits.”
• “When courts dismiss claims under Heck, they typically do so without prejudice . 4 . . .”
• “When courts dismiss claims under Heck, they typically do so without prejudice . . . and dismissals without prejudice generally are not judgments on the merits for claim-preclusion purposes[.]”
• “When courts dismiss claims under Heck, they typically do so without prejudice.”
• “When courts dismiss claims under Heck, they typically do so without prejudice”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).