· 8/3/2001
Eric Michael v. St. Joseph County
Citations
- 259 F.3d 842
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 17268
- 2001 WL 874142
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “[b]ecause the purpose of summary judgment is to isolate and dispose of factually unsupported claims,” a plaintiff must respond with “specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial”
- plaintiff failed to demonstrate retaliation where a vague characterization of what was said was the only evidence of protected speech
- plaintiff failed to demonstrate retaliation where a vague characterization of what was said was the only evidence of protected speech
- plaintiff failed to 6 No. 04-3308 demonstrate retaliation where a vague characterization of what was said was the only evidence of protected speech
- definite and concrete evidence is required to rebut summary judgment motion; merely raising “metaphysical doubt” is not enough
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairchild, Bauer, Posner
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.