Eric Jenkins, Petitioner-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Christopher Artuz, Superintendent, Respondent-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that there was no waiver because “the prosecutor’s actions cannot be overlooked on the ground that [defense] counsel did not continue to seek to gain an admission from [the witness] as to the plea agreement”
• concluding that the words “without merit” constituted an adjudication on the merits
• stating that the prosecutor’s promotion of the false testimony at summation “plainly sharpened the prejudice,” “ ‘ha[d] no place in the administration of justice[,] and should neither be permitted nor rewarded”
• stating that the prosecutor’s promotion of the false testimony at summation “plainly sharpened the prejudice,” “ ‘ha[d] rio place in the administration of justice [,] and should neither be permitted nor rewarded’ ”
• stating that “the prosecutor’s actions cannot be overlooked” on the ground that defense counsel knew about and “did not continue to seek to gain an admission from [the witness] as to [his] plea agreement”
• stating that “the prosecutor’s actions cannot be overlooked” on the ground that defense counsel knew about and “did not continue to seek to gain an admission from [the witness] as to [his] plea agreement”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).